Noteworthy – Listorati https://listorati.com Fascinating facts and lists, bizarre, wonderful, and fun Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:43:48 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://listorati.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/listorati-512x512-1.png Noteworthy – Listorati https://listorati.com 32 32 215494684 10 Bizarrely Noteworthy Medical Milestones Throughout History https://listorati.com/10-bizarrely-noteworthy-medical-milestones-throughout-history/ https://listorati.com/10-bizarrely-noteworthy-medical-milestones-throughout-history/#respond Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:43:48 +0000 https://listorati.com/10-bizarrely-noteworthy-medical-milestones-throughout-history/

The history of medicine has not unfurled gradually. Instead, it is made up of moments—points in time when someone did something really important that would go on to have a significant impact on the medical world as a whole. Each subsequent moment brings us closer to the inevitable conclusion where we all become immortal cyborgs, but until that day, we can look back on some of the noteworthy moments from our past.

10Charles-Francois Felix Removes The Sun King’s Anal Fistula

01

The year is 1686, and the king has a pain in the butt. Specifically, we are talking about Louis XIV, king of France. Despite enjoying a very lengthy reign of 72 years (also earning the moniker “the Sun King”), Louis was not a healthy man. He suffered from headaches, gout, periostitis, and (some also suspect) diabetes. And in 1686, the king was stricken with a very painful anal fistula that would not go away despite all the enemas and poultices that were the accepted practice at the time.

Perhaps in an act of desperation, the king did something unusual for that time—he turned to a barber-surgeon. Back then, physicians considered surgery beneath them, so the practice was usually left to barbers since they were skilled with a blade. The barber in question was named Charles-Francois Felix. He received around six months to prepare and was told to come up with a procedure to ease the king’s suffering. After practicing on 75 alleged volunteers from France’s prisons, Felix perfected two instruments with which to perform the surgery—a spreader and a scraper.

The procedure went well, and King Louis showered Felix with wealth and titles. All of a sudden, having an anal fistula became the latest trend in France, and many courtiers approached Felix, demanding the royal surgery to imitate the king. But on a more serious note, this also helped legitimize surgery, and physicians started looking at it as a viable alternative.

9Ambroise Pare Runs Out Of Oil

02

One of the most famous barber-surgeons in history was Ambroise Pare. During the 16th century, he served four different French kings, and before that, he was a pioneer of battlefield medicine. During that time, the pain suffered by a patient wasn’t of paramount concern to medical professionals. It was more of a “you either live or you die” scenario. Pain was expected with most medical procedures, and it wasn’t uncommon for it to be so excruciating that patients would pass out in the middle of the operation.

One of the most painful but essential procedures was cauterization. The surgeon would use boiling oil to seal gunshot wounds. Even so, the chances of the patient surviving the ordeal were slim. In 1536, during the Italian War, Pare was serving as a war surgeon. One day, he ran out of boiling oil to treat injured soldiers, so he created a tincture using rose oil, egg yolks, and turpentine. He didn’t expect it to do much good. To his surprise, the next day, the soldiers treated with his new recipe were in much better shape.

Pare showed the world there were less agonizing alternatives to cauterization and continued his trend by also popularizing the use of ligatures after amputations. Furthermore, Pare brought attention to his ideas through a very simple yet unconventional method—he wrote in French instead of Latin. That way, all the less educated barber-surgeons would be able to learn what he had to say.

8Andreas Vesalius’s Dissections

03

Claudius Galenus (or simply Galen) was one of the most important scientists of ancient Greece. Primarily a physician and surgeon, Galen’s medical accomplishments are almost on par with those of Hippocrates. He became renowned for his insight into the inner workings of the human body, which he gained primarily through dissections on animals. However, we are still talking about the second century here, so Galen got a lot of stuff wrong.

The man was so respected that his notions remained mostly unchallenged for centuries. It wasn’t until the 16th century that Galen’s teachings were challenged by another publication by Dutch anatomist Andreas Vesalius. In 1543, Vesalius wrote On the Fabric of the Human Body, which showed conclusively that Galen was wrong on several points regarding the human anatomy. More than that, Vesalius based all of his observations on his own personal human dissections, so he also urged doctors to take a hands-on approach to medicine.

Fortunately, Vesalius also had some powerful supporters (like Emperor Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire), which ensured that his book became one of the most important anatomy publications of all time. Like Pare, Vesalius wanted to ensure that his book was as accessible as possible, which is why it contained over 200 high-quality illustrations by skilled artists who were clearly present during the dissections.

7Ephraim McDowell Performs The First Ovariotomy

04

American physician Ephraim McDowell earned worldwide renown for one particular case—or two cases, if we’re counting the time he removed bladder stones from a 17-year-old James Polk, future president of the United States.

On December 13, 1809, McDowell went to see Jane Todd Crawford, a woman who was thought to be pregnant beyond term by her local doctor. After McDowell inspected her, he promptly diagnosed Mrs. Crawford with a giant ovarian tumor. He explained to her that nobody had ever tried to remove such a tumor and that most doctors would consider the procedure impossible.

Even so, Mrs. Crawford had nothing to lose at that point, so she let McDowell operate on her. She had to endure a 25-minute procedure without anesthesia, during which the doctor removed a 10-kilogram (22 lb) tumor. Despite the grim prognosis, Mrs. Crawford recovered fully in less than a month and lived for 32 more years. McDowell went on to become known as the “father of the ovariotomy,” although not immediately since he waited for eight more years before writing about the procedure.

6Richard Lower Performs The First Blood Transfusion

05

Blood transfusions are an essential part of modern medicine, but there was a time when they were mocked. Obviously, blood has played a role in many rituals throughout history, but it wasn’t until the middle of the 17th century in London that transfusions were studied as a possible medical treatment. The man behind the research was Richard Lower, an Oxford physician and member of the Royal Society, which had only formed a few years prior.

In 1665, Lower performed the first successful animal transfusion. He took blood from one dog and put it in another dog. That done, he moved on to people. In 1667, a sheep served as the donor, while a volunteer named Arthur Coga became the first human recipient of a blood transfusion and was paid 20 shillings for his services. Noted diarist Samuel Pepys was present at Coga’s medical procedure and took extensive notes.

Coga received 9–10 ounces of sheep’s blood, and the landmark procedure was published in Philosophical Transactions. However, the public didn’t regard this event as anything noteworthy. Quite the opposite, in fact. Lower and the Royal Society were mocked and branded as mad scientists. A play called The Virtuoso written by Thomas Shadwell even satirized the sheep-to-human transfusion.

Coga was a little mad, and Lower incorrectly thought the blood transfusion would fix his mental problems. When that didn’t happen, people dismissed the idea, and it would take a century before blood transfusions would seriously be considered again.

5Dominique Jean Larrey Perfects Battlefield Medicine

06

Dominique Jean Larrey is often regarded as the first modern military surgeon because of his many innovations in the field that are still relevant today. It didn’t take long for Larrey to learn all the standard practices of the time and enroll as a military surgeon under Napoleon. After that, he pretty much decided that all of those practices were wrong. For example, it was standard for hospitals to be kept miles away from the battlefield for safety. While this made them safe, it also made them empty, as many injured soldiers died en route. Larrey decided that battlefield medicine would be much more effective in medical tents erected near the front lines.

Now that the hospitals were closer, Larrey also wanted the method of transportation to be faster. That idea gave birth to the flying ambulance, the first army ambulance corps. They were horse-drawn carriages, typically used to maneuver artillery. Larrey also became an expert on amputations, developing techniques to make the procedure faster and safer. Supposedly, he once performed 200 amputations within 24 hours.

Larrey’s dedication earned him the admiration of Napoleon (who first named him surgeon-in-chief of the French army and later a baron), but he was also idolized by the soldiers. After the devastating defeat at the Battle of Borodino, Larrey was picked up and passed around crowdsurfing-style by soldiers who wanted to make sure he didn’t get trampled while retreating. Even Napoleon’s most bitter enemy, the Duke of Wellington, gave orders to his men not to shoot on Larrey’s tent at Waterloo.

4Sushruta’s Rhinoplasty

07

Ancient India excelled in many scientific fields such as mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. While the Western medical world had men like Hippocrates and Galen, India had Sushruta. An ancient surgeon active during the sixth and fifth centuries BC, Sushruta is sometimes called the “father of plastic surgery” for his teachings on nasal reconstructions. He gave quite a detailed description on how to perform a primitive form of rhinoplasty by removing skin from the cheek flap and attaching it to the nose. We can’t say for sure if Sushruta ever actually successfully attempted this procedure, but the level of detail is still quite remarkable for the time period.

Plastic surgery aside, Sushruta’s other notable contribution to medicine was the Sushruta Samhita, an ancient text that became one of the foundations of Ayurveda, the traditional Indian medicine that’s still used today. The compendium contained most, if not all, of the medical knowledge India had at the time. It covered over 1,000 illnesses and hundreds of plants, minerals, and animal preparations that supposedly had healing capabilities.

3Jean Civiale Performs The First Minimally Invasive Surgery

08

Passing a kidney stone is often claimed as one of the most painful experiences you can endure, with certain women even putting it one step above the pain of child labor. Over one million people have to deal with a kidney stone every year in America alone. Thankfully, we don’t do it the old-fashioned way anymore. Nowadays, we use a minimally invasive procedure called a lithotripsy, which uses various techniques to crush the stones.

Before the 19th century, the standard procedure was a lithotomy. It involved making an incision and removing the stone whole. Not only was it extremely painful, but it also carried a high mortality rate. But in came French physician Jean Civiale with his invention, the lithotrite, which he used to perform the first minimally invasive surgery in the world. With this tool, Civiale was able to crush the stone before removing it through the urethra.

Civiale, a pioneer of urology and the founder of the first urology center in the world at Necker Hospital in Paris, showed that his method was much more efficient than a lithotomy. While the traditional technique had a mortality rate of over 18 percent, his lithotripsy hovered around the 2-percent mark. He did this through an ample and comprehensive study commissioned by the Paris Academy of Science, a significant feat of evidence-based medicine that was highly influential for the time.

2George Hayward Performs First Amputation Under General Anesthesia

09

Very soon after William Morton introduced ether as anesthesia in 1846 with his “Letheon” inhaler, physicians were already thinking of the possible applications it might have. Sure, the gas proved itself potent enough during a minor surgical procedure, but could it be used for major surgery as well?

The process was somewhat delayed by Morton’s reluctance to reveal ether as the core ingredient of his inhaler. Doctors wanted to use his concoction but were wary of using an unknown agent on their patients due to potential side effects. Morton offered to supply Boston hospitals with Letheon free of charge, but physicians took a stand and demanded to know the formula used with the inhaler. At this point, Morton finally conceded and admitted to using sulfuric ether.

Now that that issue was out of the way, the anesthesia could be used on a much more ambitious medical procedure—an amputation. The task was undertaken by Dr. George Hayward. The patient was a 21-year-old servant girl named Alice Mohan whose leg needed to be amputated due to tuberculosis. Like before, Morton administered the gas until the patient fell asleep. Hayward tested her reaction by stabbing Alice with a pin. When she didn’t react, he quickly proceeded to cut off her leg.

Alice later awoke, not realizing that she’d fallen asleep and that the procedure was finished. When she said she was ready to begin, Hayward reached down and picked up her leg from sawdust and presented it to its former owner.

1Ignaz Semmelweis Tells Doctors To Wash Their Hands

10

Humans can be very slow to change when a new notion goes against long-held beliefs. Richard Lower was mocked for his work on blood transfusions. When Edward Jenner came up with the smallpox vaccine, he was criticized by the clergy for his ungodly work. And yet probably no man has made a greater contribution to medicine that earned him nothing but scorn and mockery than Ignaz Semmelweis.

Nowadays, the man is known as the “savior of mothers” and you don’t get that kind of moniker unless you did something right. We also know that infection is a serious problem, and doctors go to great lengths to ensure that they operate under sanitary conditions. This wasn’t always the case, though.

Joseph Lister usually gets the credit for pioneering antiseptic surgery, but Dr. Semmelweis had the same idea several decades prior. The only difference between them was that Semmelweis became a pariah of the medical world for his ideas.

Semmelweis realized that there was a direct correlation between infection and puerperal fever in obstetrical clinics. Just by washing their hands and their instruments, doctors could drastically lower the mortality rates caused by the fever to below 1 percent. Puerperal fever was a common problem in the 19th century and had a mortality rate of up to 18 percent. However, doctors simply refused to believe that they could be responsible for so many deaths. It wasn’t until Pasteur proved germ theory that people finally realized Semmelweis’s ideas had some merit. By then, Semmelweis went insane trying to convince others and was committed to an asylum, where he was beaten to death by guards.

Follow Radu on Twitter.

]]>
https://listorati.com/10-bizarrely-noteworthy-medical-milestones-throughout-history/feed/ 0 14050
10 Notorious and Noteworthy Publishing Controversies https://listorati.com/10-notorious-and-noteworthy-publishing-controversies/ https://listorati.com/10-notorious-and-noteworthy-publishing-controversies/#respond Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:25:05 +0000 https://listorati.com/10-notorious-and-noteworthy-publishing-controversies/

How often do you think about the books that you read? For many, you likely pick up a book, enjoy yourself, and then put it down, likely only revisiting it when it comes up in conversation. However, this would be doing a great disservice to the often controversial world of publishing and the backstories of countless books. Whether the book was loaded with lies or its contents led to a massive backlash, these are some noteworthy publishing controversies you should be aware of. 

10. James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces

When James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces hit bookshelves in April 2003, nobody could’ve predicted the explosive controversy it would spark. Upon first glance, the book purported itself as James Frey’s memoir, focusing on his struggles with addiction, as well as his tenure in a twelve-step rehabilitation center.

The book’s first major claim to fame was being picked as an Oprah’s Book Club selection, a definite sign of mainstream popularity. This ended up propelling it to the top of Amazon.com and The New York Times Best Seller list for fifteen weeks. Unfortunately, its other claim to fame is far from positive and it’s the reason it’s earned a spot on this list. The Smoking Gun, a website focused on legal documents and arrest records, published a piece titled A Million Little Lies, listing the book’s litany of falsities and lies.

Eventually, the genie was out of the bottle and the truth behind Frey’s book was revealed, that he’d exaggerated or completely fabricated the events described within. Soon enough Frey’s lies were exposed, resulting in Doubleday and Anchor Books, the book’s publishers, needing to release public statements. This revelation certainly touched a nerve for many, including celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain who said, “As a former addict, I found this fake redemption memoir to be morally repugnant.”

9. Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses

Published in 1988, Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses was a fantastical look at the life of Muhammad, the Islamic prophet. Much like his previous books, Rushdie utilizes magical realism, a realistic story with fictitious elements, as well as real figures and events to convey his narrative. The plot centers around the lives of two Indian expatriates, people who live outside their native country, all while touching upon ideas of faith, culture, and identity.

However, controversy would soon be on Rushdie’s heels as many Muslims ended up perceiving the book, and its portrayal of Muhammad, as blasphemous. Another point of contention for many was Rushdie’s treatment of the titular Satanic Verses, which concerned three pagan Meccan goddesses: All?t, Al-Uzza, and Man?t. All of these perceived transgressions resulted in Iran’s then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, placing a fatwa on Rushdie, marking him for immediate assassination. 

Not only was the book banned in several countries, but Rushdie himself ended up living under police protection for nearly a decade. He was also often forced to hide for long periods and constantly change residencies for his safety. It’s a prime example of how a person’s work can incite ample backlash, as well as how limited freedom of speech can be within other cultures. 

8. J.D. Salinger’s Unauthorized Sequel

Whether you love it or find it insufferable, there is no denying the impact of J.D. Salinger’s famous novel The Catcher in the Rye. While the book itself has generated its own streak of controversy over the years, that’s not what we’ll be recapping here. Instead, we’ll spotlight John David California AKA Fredrik Colting, a book author who opted to pen his own sequel to The Catcher in the Rye.

60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye, published in 2009, follows an elderly Holden Caulfield and his adventure following an escape from a retirement home. However, it wasn’t too long before Colting’s fanfiction began stirring up trouble with Salinger himself who, before he died in 2010, saw fit to slap him with a lawsuit. Sallinger argued, not unreasonably, that Colting’s book thoroughly infringed on his already existing work and was heavily exploitative regarding Holden Caulfield’s character. 

After the dispute went to court, a permanent injunction was granted by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. This injunction prevented the book from seeing official publication in the United States, though Colting did file an appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals later on.

7. Maus by Art Spiegelman

We now turn to the world of comic books and graphic novels for a moment, a venue that’s been no stranger to its fair share of controversies. The focus here is the work of Art Spiegelman, specifically his serialized graphic novel Maus, which was first published in 1980 and lasted until 1991. The comic tells the story of Spiegelman’s father and his survival in the Holocaust, told through anthropomorphic animals. Despite using mice as the Jews and cats as the nazis, the story never once pulls its punches regarding the sobering historical events portrayed within it.

Many have critiqued the book for its animal allegories, as several critics have noted how comparing Jews to mice only serves to reinforce hurtful stereotypes. However, the comic was plagued with even further controversy when it made its way to schools and public libraries, with many taking umbrage with its content. Given the subject matter, the comic doesn’t hold back with its graphic depiction of violence, nudity, and strong language. This resulted in many schools banning the book, most notably the state of Tennessee who pushed for the decision due to the story’s profane language. Despite this, the controversial status of Maus has only pushed more readers to give it a look, further encouraging people’s education regarding the Holocaust. 

6. American Dirt Controversy

As years have passed and modern culture continually evolves, the debates regarding cultural appropriation and ethnic stereotypes have only increased. Nowhere was the debate more evident than in the discourse following the 2020 release of American Dirt by Jeanine Cummins. The book concerns a Mexican woman who, with her son in tow, fled to the United States to escape cartel violence.

Many have praised the book as a thrilling read, however, just before its publication, many negative think pieces concerning American Dirt began popping up online. The common criticism was that Cummins wasn’t an appropriate choice to craft a narrative concerning Mexican culture and the immigrant experience. Many noted that Cummins, who’d identified as white in a previous interview, was simply reinforcing Mexican stereotypes via her book’s narrative. Additionally, many also pointed out several inaccuracies in its depiction of Mexican life and the lives of immigrants, further cementing the perceived inauthenticity. 

This was only heightened when American Dirt was selected for Oprah Winfrey’s book club, which propelled the controversy onto a grander and widespread stage. Cummins’ work stands as a reminder of how important cultural representation is to people and how mishandling it can lead to a serious backlash.

5. Amazon vs. Hachette Book Group

Nowadays, whether it’s a book, a new air fryer, or a six-pack of towels, if you need it at your doorstep quickly, you’re heading to Amazon.com for it. Alongside their convenient online shopping and streaming content, Amazon also has a wide array of electronic books AKA e-books for sale as well. The publishing controversy we’ll be spotlighting here is focused not just on Amazon but on Hachette Book Group, one of the largest book publishers in the industry. 

Back in 2014, Amazon, looking to lower the prices of their e-books, put pressure on Hachette to comply by delaying shipments of their physical books. They also decided to remove the pre-order option, usually present on a forthcoming book’s listing, from any new Hachette title on the site. The more this dispute went on, the more attention it received, with Amazon receiving criticism for its bullying tactics which were nothing short of harmful.

Many authors, whose work was published by Hachette, found themselves stuck right in the middle of this conflict, with the reach of their work being severely affected by it. Eventually, both parties came to a compromise via a multi-year agreement, though the specific details have never been revealed publicly.

4. The Da Vinci Code Plagiarism Allegations

When The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown hit bookshelves in 2003, it quickly became a major success, selling over 80 million copies worldwide by 2016. The book focuses on symbologist Robert Langdon who, along with cryptologist Sophie Neveu, investigates a murder in the Louvre Museum that leads them down a rabbit hole of religious conspiracy.

However, where the controversy began was the book’s alleged similarities to another book written years earlier in 1982 titled Holy Blood, Holy Grail. Much like The Da Vinci Code, the book shares a similar narrative throughline regarding the modern descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, two of the book’s three authors, ended up filing a lawsuit against Brown and his published, alleging copyright infringement.

Their argument was predicated on the notion that Brown has used the main crux of their story, plot points, and even character names without any acknowledgment, permission, or compensation. While on the stand, Brown and his legal team did state that The Da Vinci Code did draw influence from their work. However, they also maintained that the book itself was a work of fiction and drew influence from a wide crop of historical sources. Eventually, the judge ruled in favor of Brown, noting that the ideas and historical elements in question were not protected by copyright.

3. The Bell Curve

The Bell Curve, published in 1994, argued that measuring intelligence with IQ tests could predict a person’s social outcome in education, employment, and socioeconomic status. The book’s authors, Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, also suggested that racial differences played a role in the results of the tests.

Simply put, Herrnstein and Murray’s work heavily implied that racial minorities have less of a chance of success due to their genetics, a grotesquely antiquated idea to be sure. This claim sparked a fair amount of controversy, with many scholars, activists, and even the general public, accusing the authors of promoting racist ideas propped up by sketchy pseudo-science. Herrnstein and Murray also suggested that social welfare programs might be futile due to what they perceived as inherent and largely unchangeable differences in intelligence.

It has long been established that a higher IQ doesn’t always lead to higher pay or prolonged success, so their already flawed logic was shaky at best. The book’s highest critics even feared that such misguided ideas could lead to many justifying discrimination and the cutting of various social programs. The backlash was so immense that many universities were being pressured to cancel speaking events featuring the authors.

2. J.K. Rowling’s Transgender Comments

J.K. Rowling, it’s a name that at one time brought joy to the lives of many kids and young adults, but today just leaves a sour taste in their mouths. It all began in 2019 when the Harry Potter scribe tweeted support for a researcher who was terminated for stating that biological sex is immutable. This caused many to accuse her of transphobia, with many viewing her comments as diminishing toward those with transgender identities.

This was only exacerbated when, in 2020, Rowling published an entire essay outlining her concerns regarding the impact of transgender activism on women’s rights and safety. A big crux of her argument was concerning public bathrooms, claiming that a transgender person could sexually assault a biological woman. This revelation regarding Rowling’s views on the matter resulted in an ample backlash from LGBTQ+ advocates, fans, and fellow authors, all tremendously offended by her stance. 

Considering the sizable amount of Harry Potter fans who identify as LGBTQ+, this was a heartbreaking turn of events for many of her biggest fans. Rowling however remains largely unphased by her critics in this regard, even going on record as saying she doesn’t care how her legacy will be affected.

1. Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman

When it comes to famous books, there are perhaps few as famous and widely celebrated as Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird. The book, based on Lee’s childhood, is told from the perspective of Scout, a young girl who greatly admires her father, a lawyer named Atticus Finch. The book deals heavily with the topic of racial inequality, as Atticus is appointed to defend a black man who has been accused of sexually assaulting a young white woman.

This narrative presents Atticus as an ethical and very intelligent man, who refuses to be intimated out of defending his client by the town’s various racist residents. This stands in strong contrast to the version of Atticus shown in Go Set a Watchman, Lee’s sequel to To Kill A Mockingbird which was released in 2015. In the sequel, which was written by Lee before To Kill A Mockingbird, the once-noble Atticus is portrayed as a racist.

This revelation proved quite devastating to many fans of Lee’s original book, as it tainted one of literature’s most beloved characters. Additionally, Lee’s then-lawyer, Tonja Carter, had also made rather dubious claims that Lee had reneged on her almost-lifelong decision to never release the book. This, when paired with the knowledge that Lee’s health was steadily declining at the time, led many to speculate that she was being taken advantage of.

]]>
https://listorati.com/10-notorious-and-noteworthy-publishing-controversies/feed/ 0 11468